High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 08 TEL CK 5435

Mr. Iftekar Ahmed vs The State Of Telangana & Ors.

Telangana High Court · Decided on 21 August 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
B. Vijaysen Reddy, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 27518 of 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 249 words

Heard Mr. M.A. Basith, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M. Arun Kumar, learned standing counsel for GHMC for respondent Nos.2 to 4.

2.

Learned standing counsel for GHMC submitted that respondent authorities would consider the representation dated 28.07.2026 of the petitioner regarding alleged illegal construction and encroachment made by respondent Nos.5 and 6 on the subject property and pass orders in accordance with law.

3.

Recording the aforesaid submission of learned standing counsel for GHMC, without going into the merits of the case, writ petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.3 to consider the representation dated 28.07.2026 of the petitioner regarding illegal construction and encroachment made by respondent Nos.5 and 6 on the property bearing H.No.8-1-523/171, Plot No.171 admeasuring 311 square yards in Survey No.75/1 situated at Brindavan Colony, Tolichowki, Hyderabad, and pass orders, in accordance with law, by issuing notice to the petitioner, respondent Nos.5 and 6 and all other concerned/interested persons, by affording opportunity of hearing to the all parties, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4.

As this order is passed without entering into the merits, notice to respondent Nos.5 and 6 is dispensed with. If respondent Nos.5 and 6 are in anyway aggrieved by this order, they are liberty to approach this Court seeking modification of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in the writ petition stand closed.