AI-powered legal research across 12 lakh+ Indian judgments — precedents, summaries and legal principles in seconds.
0+
Searchable Judgments
All Major Courts
Supreme Court and High Court coverage
Verified Sources
Authentic court records and citations
AI-Powered
Summaries, relevance scoring and related cases
ONE RESEARCH PLATFORM
CourtKutchehry brings Indian judgments, intelligent filters and AI-assisted analysis into one workspace — so a question asked in plain language leads directly to the authorities, provisions and reasoning that matter, with every step of the trail preserved.
Ask a legal question
Start with a case name, citation, provision or a question in plain language.
Search relevant judgments
Query more than 12 lakh judgments across all major courts together.
Compare relevance and legal principles
Relevance indicators and principle tags show which authorities matter most.
Summarise, save or download the result
Generate structured summaries, organise research folders and export PDFs.
CourtKutchehry AI
CourtKutchehry AI searches the platform’s judgment database, identifies relevant legal principles and shows the supporting sources behind every response.
Open CourtKutchehry AIDelay in filing an FIR is not automatically fatal to the prosecution. Courts generally examine whether the delay has been satisfactorily explained and whether it creates a reasonable possibility of embellishment or consultation.
SUPPORTING JUDGMENTS
Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of Uttar Pradesh
Supreme Court of India · 2013 · (2014) 2 SCC 1
Amar Singh v. State of Punjab
Punjab & Haryana High Court · 2009 · 2009 SCC OnLine P&H 4041
Thulia Kali v. State of Tamil Nadu
Supreme Court of India · 1972 · (1972) 3 SCC 393
AI-assisted legal research should be reviewed by a qualified legal professional.
Suresh Chandra Jana v. State of West Bengal
SelectedSupreme Court of India · 12 Aug 2017 · (2017) 16 SCC 466 · Bench: 2 Judges
AI JUDGMENT SUMMARIES
Generate structured summaries covering case background, material facts, legal issues, arguments, court reasoning, the final decision, key legal principles, cases cited and similar judgments.
Appeal against conviction under Section 302 IPC. The Supreme Court examined whether an unexplained delay in lodging the FIR, combined with inconsistencies in eyewitness accounts, rendered the prosecution case unreliable.
Discover cases with similar facts, legal questions, statutory provisions and judicial reasoning.
SELECTED JUDGMENT
Rangappa v. Sri Mohan
Supreme Court of India · 2010 · (2010) 11 SCC 441
M/s Meters and Instruments v. Kanchan Mehta
Supreme Court of India · 2017
Same interpretation of Section 138 — scope of compounding at the appellate stage.
Basalingappa v. Mudibasappa
Supreme Court of India · 2019
Similar factual circumstances — rebuttal of the presumption of a legally enforceable debt.
Bir Singh v. Mukesh Kumar
Supreme Court of India · 2019
Followed by later Supreme Court ruling on signed blank cheques handed over voluntarily.
Allahabad High Court · (2026) 11 AHC CK 0221
BNSS, 2023-Section 528, 173(3), 173(4), 208 · Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023-Section 147, 148, 152 · Constitution of India-Article 19, 19(1)(a), 19(2), 21, Part III
Supreme Court Of India · 2026 INSC 1197
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908-Order IV Rule 1, IV Rule 1(2), IV Rule 1(3), IV Rule 2, V Rule 1(1), V Rule 9, VI, VII, VII Rule 9, VII Rule 11, VII Rule 13, X, Section 2(2), 122
Supreme Court Of India · 2026 INSC 1196
Indian Penal Code, 1860-Section 302, 498A, 342, 406, 34, 364 · Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973-Section 161, 386(a) · Evidence Act, 1872-Section 106
Allahabad High Court · (2026) 11 AHC CK 0217
Cr.P.C.-Sections 374 (2), 313, 437-A · IPC-Sections 498-A, 304-B, 306, 302 · Dowry Prohibition Act-Section 4 · Indian Evidence Act-Section 113-B
Supreme Court Of India · 2026 INSC 1194
Constitution of India-Articles 14, 16, 39(d), 318 · Uttarakhand Public Service Commission (Conditions of Service) Regulations, 2004-Regulation 7(1), 7(2) · Haryana Public Service Commission (Conditions of Service) Regulations, 1973-Regulation 6(2) · Haryana Public Service Commission (Conditions of Service) Regulations, 1972-Rule 9, 9-A, Regulation 9-A(1) · Union Public Service Commission (Members) Amendment Regulations, 2007-Proviso · Union Public Service Commission (Members) Regulations, 1969-Regulation 9, Explanation (II) · Civil Service Regulations-Paragraph 526, Clause (b)
Allahabad High Court · (2026) 11 AHC CK 0220
Constitution of India-Article 227 · Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972-Section 21(1)(a), 34(1)(c) · Code of Civil Procedure, 1908-Section 75, Order XXVI Rule 9, XLI Rule 27, 151 and 141
Search or ask
Enter a case name, citation, provision or legal question.
Review relevant sources
Compare judgments and relevance indicators.
Understand the decision
Generate structured summaries and identify key legal principles.
Build your research
Save, organise, cite and download useful material.
BUILT FOR EVERY PRACTICE
Locate supporting precedents faster
Prepare case arguments with connected authorities
Summarise lengthy judgments before hearings
Search legislation and judicial interpretation together
WORKSPACE PREVIEW
Hearing preparation workspace
Trusted
“One connected workspace”
CourtKutchehry reduces the time spent moving between multiple legal databases. The relevance indicators and structured summaries make the first stage of research significantly more focused.
“Connected research”
The ability to move from a legal provision to related judgments creates a much more connected research workflow.
“A running start”
CourtKutchehry AI is especially useful for identifying an initial set of authorities before conducting a detailed manual review.
“Prepared for hearings”
Structured summaries before a hearing mean I walk in already knowing the reasoning of every authority the other side may cite.
“Beyond keyword search”
Similar judgment discovery has surfaced precedents I would simply not have found through keyword search alone.
“Doctrinal work, faster”
For doctrinal work, tracing how a single provision has been interpreted across decades is now a one-afternoon task.
“One connected workspace”
CourtKutchehry reduces the time spent moving between multiple legal databases. The relevance indicators and structured summaries make the first stage of research significantly more focused.
“Connected research”
The ability to move from a legal provision to related judgments creates a much more connected research workflow.
“A running start”
CourtKutchehry AI is especially useful for identifying an initial set of authorities before conducting a detailed manual review.
“Prepared for hearings”
Structured summaries before a hearing mean I walk in already knowing the reasoning of every authority the other side may cite.
“Beyond keyword search”
Similar judgment discovery has surfaced precedents I would simply not have found through keyword search alone.
“Doctrinal work, faster”
For doctrinal work, tracing how a single provision has been interpreted across decades is now a one-afternoon task.
Placeholder testimonials — hover to pause; replace with verified quotes.
Start with a month of full access.
₹299
1 month · paid once + applicable tax
₹299 / month
Total including tax: ₹352.82
1,000
Court Kutchehry AI Credits / month
Build a regular research routine.
₹759
3 months · paid once + applicable tax
₹253 / month
Total including tax: ₹895.62
1,100
Court Kutchehry AI Credits / month
More time for the work that matters.
₹1,299
6 months · paid once + applicable tax
₹216.50 / month
Total including tax: ₹1,532.82
1,200
Court Kutchehry AI Credits / month
A full year. Our best membership value.
₹2,199
12 months · paid once + applicable tax
₹183.25 / month
Total including tax: ₹2,594.82
1,300
Court Kutchehry AI Credits / month
One payment. No auto-renewal. Applicable tax added at checkout.
NEW · 2026Will Writing Simplified · Dr. Ravinder Kumar Anand, Advocate · First Edition 2026
The law, procedure and drafting of wills, codicils, revocation, probate, letters of administration and succession certificates — explained without jargon, backed by Supreme Court case law.
The platform covers more than 12 lakh judgments from the Supreme Court of India and High Courts, spanning criminal, civil, constitutional, commercial, service and family law, alongside landmark and recently reported decisions.
Yes. You can search by legal issue, statutory provision, citation, court, judge or plain-language description — the search understands legal concepts, not just exact case titles.
It analyses your question, searches the judgment database for matching legal principles and factual patterns, and ranks results with relevance indicators — always showing the supporting sources behind each response.
AI summaries and research results are designed to assist and accelerate research, not replace it. They should always be verified against the original judgments and statutory materials before being relied on in practice.
Yes. All paid plans include judgment PDF downloads.
Very much so. Structured summaries, landmark case collections and connected legal research make it useful for coursework, moots and building foundational legal understanding.
Yes. You can upgrade, downgrade or cancel at any time — changes apply from your next billing cycle with no hidden charges.
Search Indian judgments, understand legal principles and discover relevant authorities through one connected legal research platform.