Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2026) 10 CAT CK 3397

Shiv Kumar vs Shri Rajneesh Agarwal

Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad · Decided on 13 October 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajnish Kumar Rai, Member (J) · Manju Pandey, Member (A)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Misc. Contempt Petition No.123 of 2026 IN Original Application No.1066 of 2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 158 words

By Hon’ble Mr. Rajnish Kumar Rai, Member (Judicial)

Mr. Shubhasis Halder, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Ms. Seema Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent, are present and heard.

2.

At the outset, learned counsel for both the parties submit that the order passed by this Tribunal has been duly complied with.

3.

In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for both the parties, we are of the opinion that the directions contained in the order dated 07.11.2025 passed in O.A. No. 1066 of 2025 have been substantially complied with. In the facts and circumstances of the case, no wilful or deliberate disobedience of the order passed by this Tribunal is made out.

4.

Accordingly, no case of civil contempt is made out. The contempt proceedings are, therefore, dropped, and the notice issued to the respondent stands discharged.

5.

All pending M.As., if any, also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.