Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2024) 02 CAT CK 3489

S.M.Sahadevan vs Union Of India & Ors.

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 19 February 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
K. Haripal, Judicial Member
CASE NUMBER
O.A No.180/00676/2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 164 words

When taken up today, learned counsel for the applicant, inviting my attention to the averments in reply statement, submits that the Original Application can be closed. It has come out that the applicant has already been granted provisional pension and then, he passed away in December 2023.

2.

It is submitted by the learned SCGSC that family pension will be granted to the widow of the applicant, as per law. Recording the same, the Original Application is closed. No costs.

List of Annexures

Annexure A1- A true copy of the letter bearing No.Y/P.500/Xii/SMS/10/2020 dated 12.10.2020, issued by the 4th respondent

Annexure A2- A true copy of the representation dated 22.10.2022 addressed to the 1st respondent

Annexure R1- True copy of the order issued by the Railway Board vide letter No.E O)I-2020/PU-2/SWR/51 dated 01.09.2021

Annexure R2- True copy of Provisional PPO dated 20.01.2023

Annexure R3- True copy of the letter dated 4.2.2022 submitted by the applicant

Annexure R4- True copy of letter No.Y/W.277/Land dated 15.2.2022