Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2022) 05 NGT CK 0023

Nagendra Tripathi & Anr vs State of U.P

National Green Tribunal · Decided on 10 May 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arun Kumar Tyagi, JM · Dr.Afroz Ahmad, EM
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No.318 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 166 words
1.

The grievances in the present letter petition sent by Mr. Nagendra Tripathi and Anupam Jaiswal residents of Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh are regarding illegal construction and unauthorized storage of minerals in Anand Bhawan in Heritage Zone of Prayagraj.

2.

As provided in Section 14 of the National Green Tribunal Act, this Tribunal has jurisdiction over all civil cases where a substantial question relating to environment (including enforcement of any legal right relating to environment), is involved and such question arises out of the implementation of the enactments specified in Schedule I. The complaint made by the applicants is general and vague and lacks requisite particulars. The grievances of the applicants regarding illegal construction and unauthorized storage of minerals also do not involve any substantial question relating to environment arising out of the implementation of the enactments specified in schedule I to the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010.

In view of the above, this application is dismissed without prejudice to availing of appropriate remedies by the applicants.