Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2021) 01 CAT CK 0653

Kay Prasad vs Dr. Tirlochan Mohapatra & Anr.

Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi · Decided on 5 January 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
L. Narasimha Reddy, Chairman · Pradeep Kumar, Member (A)
CASE NUMBER
C.P. No. 167/2020 in O.A. No. 862/2014

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 153 words

Justice L. Narasimha Reddy, Chairman:

This contempt case is filed alleging that despite specific order dated 08.12.2015 prohibiting the respondents from making any recovery from the applicant, the respondents issued an order dated 09.03.2020 requiring the applicant to deposit a sum of Rs.2,78,886/-.

2.

The respondents filed counter affidavit dealing with the various contentions urged by the applicant.

3.

Heard Mr. R.K. Jain, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Praveen Swaroop, learned counsel for the respondents.

4.

This is the second round of contempt proceedings initiated against the respondents. Earlier when the applicant filed a contempt, the respondents had withdrawn the order of recovery. Thereafter, another order was issued on 09.03.2020 by referring the various developments in the case. However, the respondents have realized their mistake and issued an order dated 02.01.2021 withdrawing the order dated 09.03.2020. With this, the grievance of the applicant stands redressed. This contempt case is accordingly closed.