AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer
An application has been filed by the advocate for the appellant seeking discharge from appearing as the counsel for the appellant. Even though no
reason has been given as to why he wants to withdraw his vakalatnama nonetheless we grant permission to the appellant to withdraw. The application
is allowed. The learned counsel for the appellant states that he has also intimated the client about the discharge application. The application is allowed.
No one appears on behalf of the appellant to press the restoration application. Dismissed for want of prosecution.
The present matter was heard through video conference due to Covid-19 pandemic. At this stage it is not possible to sign a copy of this order nor a
certified copy of this order could be issued by the registry. In these circumstances, this order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary on behalf
of the bench and all concerned parties are directed to act on the digitally signed copy of this order. Parties will act on production of a digitally signed
copy sent by fax and/or email.
