Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2023) 10 CAT CK 3352

Ayodhya Prasad vs Union Of India & Ors.

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 13 October 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
B.K. Shrivastava, Member (J)
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No.1269/2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 119 words

O R D E R

Shri Voijay Kashhyap on behalf of Shri Gaurav Gautam and Shri Sameer Kumar Rai, counsel for the applicant. Shri Praveen Shukla, counsel for the respondents.

2.

It appears from the record that on 20.01.2023 the Substitution Application was allowed by the court and the applicant was directed to amend the OA within a week and also to supply a copy of the amended OA.

3.

The aforesaid order was not complied with till today. The time was granted on 29.03.2023, 14.08.2023, 08.09.2023 and 15.09.2023. Sufficient opportunities have been granted but the aforesaid amendment has not been carried out. Therefore, looking to the non-compliance of the court order the OA No.1269/2019 is dismissed. No costs