High CourtsDivision Bench(2022) 08 MAN CK 0034

Yambem Puni vs Ranjita Achom; & Ors

Manipur High Court · Decided on 16 August 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay Kumar, CJ · MV Muralidaran, J
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Case (Regular First Appeal) No. 1 Of 2021, Miscellaneous Case (Regular First Appeal) No. 1, 2 Of 2020, Miscellaneous Case (Regular First Appeal) No. 2 Of 2021, Regular First Appeal No. 2, 3 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 173 words

Sanjay Kumar (CJ)

The Registry’s Note dated 12.08.2022 states that the appellant made a complaint to the police authorities with regard to the alleged forgery of her signature on the second Vakalatnama filed before the Trial Court. Pursuant thereto, the Investigating Officer requested that the original Vakalatnama purportedly filed by the appellant before the Trial Court should be handed over to him for the purpose of investigation.

The learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Imphal East, is permitted to retain a photocopy of both the Vakalatnamas filed on behalf of the appellant before the Trial Court and handover the originals thereof to the Investigating Officer under proper acknowledgment. The same shall be returned to the Trial Court in due course of time.

Mr. LN. Ngamba, learned counsel, appears for the appellant.

Mr. Ajitkevin, learned counsel for the respondents, states that he was served with a copy of a Death Certificate, in relation to the prayer of the appellant in MC (RFA) No. 1 of 2021, and seeks time to get instructions.

Post on 30.08.2022.