High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 12 DEL CK 0761

Virendra Kumar vs Union Of India & Anr.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 20 December 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jyoti Singh, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(C) 5349/2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 356 words

JYOTI SINGH, J. (ORAL)

1.

This writ petition was filed by the Petitioner seeking the following reliefs:

“a)

Issue Writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the Respondents FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF MEDICAL CLAIM OF PETITIONER EX-Manager (G) FOR HIS JOINT KNEE REPLACEMENT OF BOTH KNEES OPERATED IN AIIMS NEW DELHI ON 15-05-2017.

b)

Award the appropriate amount of Damage caused to the Petitioners due to Negligence of the Respondents cost of writ petition in favour of the petitioner.

c)

Issue any other suitable writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”

2.

In the counter affidavit filed on behalf of Respondent No. 2/FCI it is stated that reimbursement of the medical charges to the tune of Rs. 2,08,510/- has been done which includes cost of surgery of Rs. 78,510/- and cost of implant of Rs. 1,30,000/-.

3.

Insofar as the remaining amount of Rs.86,000/- is concerned, the stand of Respondent No. 2 is that since no bill/invoice from AIIMS has been furnished by the Petitioner towards the knee surgery the reimbursement could not be made.

4.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No. 2 submits that in case the Petitioner furnishes a bill or invoice duly endorsed and verified by AIIMS, the same shall be processed for reimbursement within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of the invoice from the Petitioner.

5.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the needful shall be done by the Petitioner and the bill/invoice duly verified by AIIMS shall be furnished to Respondent No. 2 within a period of ten days from today.

6.

Writ petition is accordingly allowed giving liberty to the Petitioner to forward the bill/invoice as required under the Circular to Respondent No. 2 and the concerned officials, on receipt thereof, shall process the claim of the Petitioner within two weeks thereafter. Needless to state that if Respondent No. 2 finds any discrepancy in the bill or requires any further clarification, due intimation in that regard shall be given to the Petitioner.

7.

Writ petition stands disposed of.