High CourtsSingle Bench(2017) 11 DEL CK 0207

Dr. B. P. Sinha vs Union Of India & Anr.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 24 November 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sunil Gaur, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 10406 Of 2017, Civil Miscellaneous No. 42513, 42514 Of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 393 words

Sunil Gaur, J

1.

Petitioner aged about 78 years claims to be in the last stage of Prostate Cancer and is said to have incurred medical expenses to the tune of Rs.

4,98,374/- and had sought its reimbursement. As per Annexure P-6 (colly.), petitioner’s claim for reimbursement of medical expenses has been

returned in original to petitioner to provide two clarifications as contained at item Nos.6 & 7 thereof. Alongwith Annexure P-6 (colly.), there is a

calculation sheet in respect of petitioner’s treatment expenses, which, according to respondents, indicates that the medical claim payable to

petitioner is Rs. 2,23,727/-.

2.

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in response to Annexure P-6 (colly.), petitioner had submitted a Reply of 27th October, 2017 (Annexure

P-10) seeking reimbursement of entire amount claimed, but neither there is any response from respondents nor has the admitted amount of Rs.

2,23,727/- been paid to petitioner. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that to meet the recurring medical expenses, petitioner needs reimbursement

of medical claim and so, instead of filing a representation, petitioner has straightaway approached this Court.

3.

Despite service of advance notice, none appears on behalf of respondent No.2.

4.

Upon hearing, it is deemed appropriate to direct second respondent to pay the admitted amount of Rs. 2,23,727/- to petitioner within two weeks

from today. So far as the remaining amount claimed by petitioner is concerned, learned counsel for petitioner submits that instead of making a

representation, it would be appropriate if second respondent is directed to consider petitioner’s reply/objections of 27th October, 2017 (Annexure

P-10) and if second respondent declines petitioner’s claim for reimbursement of remaining medical amount, then reasons for doing so be provided

and conveyed to petitioner, promptly.

5.

In view of aforesaid, this petition and the applications are disposed of with direction to second respondent to pay the admitted amount of Rs.

2,23,727/- to petitioner within two weeks and to consider petitioner’s reply/objections of 27th October, 2017 (Annexure P-10) within three weeks

from today and in case petitioner’s entire medical claim is not reimbursed, then the reasons for not doing so, be spelt out and conveyed to

petitioner within a week thereafter, so that petitioner may avail of the remedies as available in law, if need be.

6.

Copy of this order be given dasti under the signatures of the Court Master to petitioner’s counsel.