Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2024) 07 CAT CK 1811

Smt. Bhagwantin Bai Goswami vs Union Of India & Ors.

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 11 July 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Akhil Kumar Srivastava, Judicial Member · Kumar Rajesh Chandra, Administrative Member
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Application No.203/00629/2024 (in OA No. 203/367/2023)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 134 words

This M.A. has been filed by the applicant for restoring the O.A. No. 203/367/2023, which was dismissed for want of prosecution.

2.

On perusal of the order of this Tribunal, it was found that the applicant’s counsel was very irregular in his representation in O.A. 203/367/2023 and the same was dismissed for want of prosecution.

3.

The counsel for the applicant has objection in allowing this Miscellaneous Application.

4.

The O.A. is pertaining to year 2023 and dismissed at the stage of filing of reply in the year 2024 when the applicant was continuously absent from the last two occasions. In the interest of justice, one more chance is granted to the applicant to prosecute this matter.

5.

Accordingly, this Miscellaneous Application is allowed and the O.A. 203/367/2023 is restored to its original stage.