Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2020) 12 CAT CK 0718

Sh. Aman Kumar vs Staff Selection Commission & Ors.

Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi · Decided on 23 December 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.N. Singh, Member (J) · A.K. Bishnoi, Member (A)
CASE NUMBER
O.A. No. 2150/2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 404 words

Hon’ble Mr. R.N. Singh, Member (A):

The present application has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 to challenge the test/report dated 03.12.2020 (Annexure A/1) whereby the candidature of the applicant has been rejected on the ground that the height of the applicant does not meet the criteria as mandated in the selection process to the post of Sub Inspector in Delhi Police. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that though the impugned report indicates the provision for appeal against the measurement of the physical standard, however, when the applicant has attempted to prefer the necessary appeal, the respondents have not been ready to accept and entertain the same. She further submits that the claim of the applicant is squarely covered by the judgment dated 30.10.2015 of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in WP(C ) No. 10120/2015 titled Sandeep Singh vs. CISF through Director General & Ors.

2.

Issue notice. Sh. R.K. Jain, learned counsel for the respondents, who appears on advance service, accepts notice. He submits that there is no proof on record to indicate that the applicant has preferred any appeal.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant shall be satisfied if the present OA is disposed of with liberty to the applicant to prefer a necessary appeal against the impugned report within three days from today and with a direction to the respondents to consider such appeal in a time bound manner.

4.

In view of the facts and circumstances and keeping in view the order/judgment of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi noted hereinabove, the OA is disposed of with liberty to the applicant to prefer an appeal against the impugned report within three days from today and the respondent is directed that if such an appeal is preferred by the applicant within the time stipulated herein, the respondents shall consider the same for the purpose of only determining the applicant’s height. The respondents are further directed to intimate the petitioner within two weeks, the date, time and venue for his necessary medical examination to determine his height. The applicant shall not be accorded less than seven days notice for such purpose. The candidature of the applicant shall depend upon such medical examination got conducted by the appellate authority.

5.

The OA is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Pending MA, if any, stands disposed of accordingly. No costs.