Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2020) 12 CAT CK 0092

Aman Kumar vs Staff Selection Commission

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 23 December 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
A. K. Bishnoi, Member (A) · R.N. Singh, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 2150 Of 2020, Miscellaneous Application No. 2742 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 403 words

R.N. Singh, Member (A)

1.

The present application has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 to challenge the test/report dated

03.12.2020 (Annexure A/1) whereby the candidature of the applicant has been rejected on the ground that the height of the applicant does not meet the criteria as mandated in the selection process to the post of Sub Inspector in Delhi Police. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that though the impugned report indicates the provision for appeal against the measurement of the physical standard, however, when the applicant has attempted to prefer the necessary appeal, the respondents have not been ready to accept and entertain the same. She further submits that the claim of the applicant

is squarely covered by the judgment dated 30.10.2015 of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in WP(C ) No. 10120/2015 titled Sandeep Singh vs.

CISF through Director General & Ors.

2.

Issue notice. Sh. R.K. Jain, learned counsel for the respondents, who appears on advance service, accepts notice. He submits that there is no proof

on record to indicate that the applicant has preferred any appeal.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant shall be satisfied if the present OA is disposed of with liberty to the applicant to prefer

a necessary appeal against the impugned report within three days from today and with a direction to the respondents to consider such appeal in a time

bound manner.

4.

In view of the facts and circumstances and keeping in view the order/judgment of the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi noted hereinabove, the OA

is disposed of with liberty to the applicant to prefer an appeal against the impugned report within three days from today and the respondent is directed that if such an appeal is preferred by the applicant within the time stipulated herein, the respondents shall consider the same for the purpose of only

determining the applicant’s height. The respondents are further directed to intimate the petitioner within two weeks, the date, time and venue for

his necessary medical examination to determine his height. The applicant shall not be accorded less than seven days notice for such purpose. The candidature of the applicant shall depend upon such medical examination got conducted by the appellate authority.

5.

The OA is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Pending MA, if any, stands disposed of accordingly. No costs.