High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 02 RAJ CK 0004

Satyanarayan vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 2 February 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vinod Kumar Bharwani, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 19 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 166 words

Vinod Kumar Bharwani, J

The instant misc. application has been filed by the applicant with the prayer to make correction in the order dated 07.02.2022 passed by this Court in

S.B. Criminal Second Misc. Bail Application for Suspension of Sentence No.25/2022, as in the last para of the said order description of satisfactory

authority has been erroneously mentioned as ‘trial judge’ instead of the ‘Dy. Registrar (Judicial), Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur’. The

applicant-appellant was unable to submit bail bonds as he is in judicial custody in another case.

The prayer for correction is justified.

Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. application is allowed and it is ordered that in the order dated 07.02.2022 passed by this Court in S.B. Criminal

Second Misc. Bail Application for Suspension of Sentence No.25/2022, in the last para of the said order words “Dy. Registrar (Judicial), Rajasthan

High Court, Jodhpur’’ be read in place of words “trial judgeâ€​.

This order shall be treated as part and parcel of the order dated 07.02.2022.