High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 11 RAJ CK 0150

Sunil Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 30 November 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Farjand Ali, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 418 Of 2022 In S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 1165 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 208 words

Farjand Ali, J

The instant Criminal Misc. Application has been filed on behalf of the applicant-appellant seeking correction in the order dated 29.11.2022 passed by this court in S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application (Appeal) No.1165/2022.

In the last paragraph of the said order, due to inadvertence name of the applicant-appellant has been mentioned as ‘Pankaj @ Munendra Kumar S/o Dinesh Kumar’ instead of ‘Sunil Kumar S/o Bheraram’ as well as ‘amount of personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of 1,00,000/-’ has been mentioned instead of ‘amount of personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each’.

Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. application is allowed and it is ordered that in the order dated 29.11.2022 passed in S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application (Appeal) No.1165/2022, in the last paragraph of the said order, name of the applicant-appellant and the amount of personal bond & the two sureties be read as ‘Sunil Kumar S/o Bheraram’ and ‘amount of personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each’ respectively in place of ‘Pankaj @ Munendra Kumar S/o Dinesh Kumar’ and ‘amount of personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.1,00,000/-’.

This order shall be treated as part and parcel of the order dated 29.11.2022.