Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2024) 02 CAT CK 3484

S.S. Parmar vs The Union Of India & Ors.

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 20 February 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Akhil Kumar Srivastava, Judicial Member · Kumar Rajesh Chandra, Administrative Member
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No.200/00730/2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 92 words

By Justice Akhil Kumar Srivastava, JM;

None for the applicant.

2.

On perusal of order sheets, it is observed that no one is appearing on behalf of the applicant since 13.10.2022 except on 21.08.2023 proxy counsel had appeared and today again when matter was called neither the applicant nor his counsel were present. Thus, it seems that the applicant has lost interest in pursuing the matter any more.

3.

In these circumstances, we are left with no option but to dismiss this Original Application for want of prosecution. Accordingly, O.A. is dismissed.