High CourtsDivision Bench(2025) 10 P&H CK 1427

Rakesh Bala And Another vs Union Of India And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 13 October 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jagmohan Bansal, J · Harpreet Kaur Jeewan, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 1550 Of 2004 (O&M)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 167 words

Jagmohan Bansal, J

1.

The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking setting aside of order dated 20.01.2004 whereby their House No.220, Sector 40-A, Chandigarh has been attached.

2.

Mr. Yogesh Putney, Senior Standing Counsel, during the course of hearing, produced copy of order dated 23.10.2019 passed by ITO, Ward-6(1), Mohali whereby attachment of aforesaid house has been lifted. The said order has been passed with the prior approval of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Chandigarh-II. He further submits that in view of the aforesaid order, the instant petition has rendered infructuous.

3.

Copy of order dated 23.10.2019 is taken on record. Registry is directed to tag the same at an appropriate place on the case file.

4.

DISMISSED as having been rendered infructuous.

5.

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, thus, they are at liberty to move an appropriate application within three months from today, if cause survives.

6.

Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.