High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 03 SHI CK 0172

Pritam Singh vs State Of H.P

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 22 March 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vivek Singh Thakur, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 356 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 181 words

Vivek Singh Thakur, J

1.

Status report has been filed wherein it is stated that trial is at the stage of evidence and for that purpose, case has been fixed for 23rd March, 2021 for recording the statements of witnesses.

2.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to file afresh after recording the statements of material witnesses. He has also requested to expedite the hearing in trial.

3.

In my considered opinion, for filing successive bail application, at any stage, as permissible under law, does not require any permission from Court and petitioner may file such application in the Competent Court including this Court without permission of Court.

4.

So far as the request of learned counsel for petitioner to expedite the trial is concerned, it would suffice to say that trial shall not be lingered on unnecessarily and shall be completed by managing the trial in terms of H.P. High Court of Himachal Pradesh Case Flow Management (Subordinate Courts), Rules, 2005.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed.