Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2021) 02 CAT CK 0456

Om Prakash vs Ministry Of Urban Development & Anr.

Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench · Decided on 22 February 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.K. Bishnoi, Member (A) · R. N. Singh, Member (J)
CASE NUMBER
OA No. 48/2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 89 words

By Hon’ble Mr. R. N. Singh, Member (J)

1.0.

It is case of the applicant that the respondents have not released the consequential benefits to the applicant for his regularized service w.e.f 1992 whereas a junior who was regularized in 1992 has been given all the benefits.

2.0.

After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the OA with liberty to the applicant in accordance with law.

3.0.

Permission is granted. OA stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty to the applicant.