Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2023) 01 NCLT CK 0622

Northern Arc Capital Limited vs Hbs Realtors Private Limited

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 5 January 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Anuradha Sanjay Bhatia, Member (Technical) · Kuldip Kumar Kareer, Member (Judicial)
CASE NUMBER
IA/10/2023, C.P. (IB)/1200(MB)2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 273 words

ORDER

I.A. 10 of 2023

By way of an application, the Applicant seeks rectification of the order dated 04.10.2022 passed in I.A. 2179 of 2022 in C.P. 1200 of 2021. It has been pointed out that in second para of the order dated 04.10.2022, it has been stated that the Petitioner has received the entire amount in terms of the settlement whereas this is not factually correct. The counsel for the Applicant submits that the entire payment has not been received from the Corporate Debtor as per the terms of the settlement. The counsel for the Applicant further referred to the consent terms attached with the I.A. No. 2179 of 2022 which shows that one-time settlement amount was to be paid by the Corporate Debtor on or before 31st of July, 2022. The counsel for the applicant further stated that the Corporate Debtor has not made the payment, as agreed to in the consent terms.

Having gone through the record, more particularly the consent terms dated 30.03.2022, it is evident that the payment was to be made on or before 31.07.2022 and the payment has not been made by the Corporate Debtor. It, therefore, has been incorrectly recorded in the order dated 04.10.2022 that the Petitioner has received the entire payment in terms of the settlement. It would, therefore, be just and proper if the order dated 04.10.2022 is rectified. Accordingly, from the second para, the 1st line stating that, “Petitioner has received the entire amount in terms of the settlement” shall stand deleted while the remaining part of the order shall remain unchanged. The application shall stand disposed of in aforesaid terms.