High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 02 J&K CK 0031

M/s. Global Stone Crusher and anr. vs State of J&K and ors.

Jammu And Kashmir High Court · Decided on 2 February 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ramalingam Sudhakar
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
90 of 2017 MP No 1 of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 345 words
1.

Two writ petitioners claim to be engaged in Stone crushing which requires the consent of Director Industries and Commerce and the approval of

the Pollution Control Board.

2.

The petitioners states that they have obtained provisional registration in November, 2012 for a period of two years. That provisional registration

was objected to by some of public spirited persons on the premise that it was a polluting industry and the consent should not have been granted.

OWP No. 121/2014 though was dismissed, since it was not properly prosecuted. In the meantime, provisional registration, which is granted for

two years, lapsed. The petitioners, therefore, filed another application or request for grant of provisional registration or for extension/renewal of the

provisional registration already granted and also the approval granted by the Pollution Control Board. The said request is dated 27.10.2016,

Annexure-G page 51. No action appears to have been taken and the petitioners are forced to come up before the Court.

3.

Mr. Ashish Kotwal, who put in appearance on behalf of respondents, states that on a limited scope the writ petition has been filed for grant of

provisional registration by the Director Industries and Commerce Department and for grant of approval by the Pollution Control Board.

4.

Accordingly, based on the request made by the petitioners, 4th respondent is directed to accord consideration to the claim of the petitioners for

grant of provisional registration or approval for the purpose of establishing Stone Crushing Unit. On such approval/renewal, respondent Nos. 2

and 3 are directed to take up the claim of the petitioners for renewal or grant of consent for establishing the Stone Crushing Unit. 4th respondent is

granted four weeks time to consider the claim of the petitioners on its own merits subject to petitioners'' complying with the requirement of law.

Similarly, the Pollution Control Board shall consider the claim of the petitioners within four weeks thereafter after the grant of consent or renewal

by the Director Industries and Commerce subject to petitioners'' complying with the requirement of law.

5.

Writ petition is disposed as above.