High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 11 UK CK 0146

Mohd. Farman Alias Javed vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 25 November 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 1645 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 220 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant is in judicial custody in Case Crime No. 340 of 2024, under Sections 303 (2), 317 (2), 109, 352, 351(3), 61 (2) (a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, Police Station Jaspur, District Udham Singh Nagar.He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

According to the FIR, the applicant is driver of the vehicle which was transporting sand without any royalty. When police signalled the vehicle to stop, it did not stop, instead the applicant tried to hit the police personnel, who somehow managed to escaped. Subsequently, the truck was apprehended. There are other allegations also in the FIR.

4.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant did not injure anyone. It is a case fit for bail.

5.

Learned State counsel admits that it is no injury case.

6.

Having considered the entirety of facts, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

7.

The bail application is allowed.

8.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.