High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 05 JH CK 0025

Modassar Khan vs State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 25 May 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajesh Kumar, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Bail Application No. 5397 of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 273 words

Defects, as pointed out by the office, are ignored for the time being.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is accused in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No. 16

of 2015 corresponding to G. R. No. 387 of 2015 registered under Sections 379/413/34 of Indian Penal Code, Section 30 (ii) of the Coal Mines Act and

Section 33 of Indian Forest Act and is pending in the Court of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh.

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 05.01.2021. Earlier the petitioner has been granted

bail vide order dated 29.07.2015 in B.A. No. 5653 of 2015. There was misuse of privilege of bail and he was taken into custody due to no appearance

before the Court below. The petitioner undertakes to participate in the trial. On the above fact, prayer for bail has been made.

On the other hand, learned A.P.P has opposed the prayer for bail. Considering the material available on record, the petitioner is directed to be released

on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub

Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh in connection with Barkagaon P.S. Case No. 16 of 2015 corresponding to G. R. No. 387 of 2015 subject to

the condition that the petitioner will submit self attested copy of his Aadhar Card and also give his mobile number before the learned court below

which he will not change during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court.