High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 09 TEL CK 1380

Koyyale Krishna Reddy vs Union of India & Ors

Telangana High Court · Decided on 3 September 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
B. Vijaysen Reddy, J
RESULT
Disposed of
CASE NUMBER
WRIT PETITION NO: 29037 OF 2026 (CNR No.HBHC010593502026)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 266 words

Heard Mr. M. Sudhakar, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mrs. N.V.R. Rajyalaxmi, learned standing counsel for Central Government, representing Mr. N. Bhujanga Rao, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for respondent No.3.

2.

Learned standing counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 submitted that in the light of judgments of this Court in W.A. No.194 of 2026 dated 17.02.2026 and W.A. No.128 of 2026 dated 05.02.2026, the petitioner is required to approach concerned Court seeking No Objection Certificate (NOC) for renewal of passport and based on which the concerned passport officer would consider the application of the petitioner for renewal of passport.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner may be given liberty to approach the learned IV Additional Junior Civil Judge - cum - IV Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Sanga Reddy District (‘trial Court’), by filing appropriate application seeking NOC, where case in C.C. No.251 of 2019 is pending.

4.

In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the petitioner to approach trial Court by filing appropriate application in C.C. No.251 of 2019 seeking NOC for issuance/renewal of passport. As and when such application is filed, the trial Court is directed to dispose of the same, within a period of one (1) week thereof, by issuing notice to respondent No.4 - de facto complainant, by affording opportunity of hearing to them. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in the writ petition stand closed.