High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 05 UK CK 0039

Intezar vs State of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 26 May 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prafulla C. Pant, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Second Bail Application No. 63 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 170 words

Prafulla C. Pant, J.—Sri Manish Arora, Advocate, present for the applicant.

2.

Sri S.S. Adhikari, AGA, present for the State.

3.

Heard.

4.

Applicant Intezar, who is in jail in connection with Crime No. 352/2009, relating to offences punishable u/s 392 and 411 of IPC, Police Station Manglaur, has sought his release on bail.

5.

The first bail application was rejected by this Court on merits on 28.8.2010.

6.

Learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that since then more than eight months have passed and applicant is still languishing in jail. However, it appears that the applicant has criminal history which includes three cases of robbery and dacoity.

7.

Having heard learned Counsel for the parties, this Court does not find any new sufficient ground to grant the bail.

8.

Therefore, the second bail application is rejected with the observation that the trial court may proceed with the case and conclude the trial, as expeditiously as possible, as the applicant is in jail. (Urgency Application No. 2041/2011 stands disposed of).