Tribunals and CommissionsFull Bench(2023) 05 NGT CK 0050

Hissar Zig Zag Bhatta Association vs Union of India & Ors

National Green Tribunal · Decided on 22 May 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Adarsh Kumar Goel, CP · Sudhir Agarwal, JM · Dr. A. Senthil Vel, EM
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 342 Of 2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 238 words
1.

Grievance in this application is for a direction to permit brick kilns with Zig-Zag Technology in Hissar, Haryana throughout the year.

2.

We have heard learned Counsel for the applicant and considered the matter. We find it difficult to entertain the application. Apart from the fact that such an application is not maintainable under Sections 14 and 15 of the NGT Act which stipulate remedy for victims of damage to the environment, no such direction is called for on merits. Mere installing of Zig-Zag Technology cannot be a ground to operate brick kilns throughout the year unless air quality and environmental norms, including siting criteria can sustain such activity.

3.

Further, the applicant has not mentioned orders prohibiting such activity beyond March to June. There is reference to order of this Tribunal dated 17.02.2021 in O.A. No. 1016/2019 which dealt with the issue of brick kilns in Delhi NCR and permitted their operation only in non-severe quality months i.e. March to June.

4.

There is also reference to Environment (Protection) Amendment Rules, 2022, notified by the MoEF&CC on 22.2.2022 regulating operation of brick kiln and CPCB guidelines prohibiting brick kilns without zig zag technology and order of this Tribunal dated 25.6.2016 to the same effect. While non zig zag technology brick kilns may stand prohibited, those following zig zag are not immune from regulation nor the said orders create any such right.

The application is accordingly dismissed.