Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2021) 02 CAT CK 0485

Dr. Hirdaya Hulas Nag vs Union Of India & Ors.

Central Administrative Tribunal, New Delhi · Decided on 18 February 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
L. Narasimha Reddy, Chairman · Aradhana Johri, Member (A)
CASE NUMBER
OA No.3060/2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 101 words

Justice L. Narasimha Reddy:

We heard the OA at some length. During the course of the hearing of the OA, it emerged that certain developments have taken place ever since the OA is filed. Noticing that, counsel for the applicant sought permission of the Tribunal to withdraw the OA after obtaining instructions from his client, without prejudice to the rights of the applicant to file a fresh OA.

2.

Permission is accorded and the OA is allowed to be dismissed as withdrawn, leaving it open to the applicant to file a fresh OA. There shall be no order as to costs.