Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2022) 04 CAT CK 0032

Dr. Aksala Hazmi K.P vs Hon'ble Administrator, UT of Lakshadweep, Kavaratti, UT of Lakshadweep, Pin � 682 555 & Others

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 21 April 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
P. Madhavan, Member, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 181, 00195 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 379 words

P.Madhavan, Member J

1.

This Original Application has been filed by the applicant seeking the following reliefs:

“(i) Call for the records leading to issuance of Annexure A5;

(ii) Quash Annexure A-5 notification issued by the 2nd respondent;

(iii) Direct the 2nd respondent to fill existing vacancies for Dental Surgeons only as per Annexure A-3 rank list;

(iv) Award costs of and incidental to this Application;

(v) Pass such other orders or directions as deemed just, fit and necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

2.

The applicant submits that she is aggrieved by the action of the 2nd respondent, who is trying to overlook a pending rank list for appointment to 9 posts of Dental Surgeons (Contract Basis) and has issued a fresh notification inviting applications for the said post. Aggrieved by the action of the respondents, the applicant has approached this Tribunal.

3.

When the matter came up for consideration before this Tribunal, counsel for the applicant submits that she is at serial no. 8 in the earlier rank list and the respondents have appointed only first five candidates from that selection list and have not appointed the remaining four persons. Instead of filling up the notified 9 posts from that list, they have issued new notification as per Annexure A5. According to her, she was at serial No. 8 and she could have been categorically appointed in the notified vacancy. She had given a representation to the competent authority as per Annexure A6 and no reply has been given till date.

4.

Adv. Ms. Sreekala K. L takes notice on behalf of the respondents and submits that respondents have no objection in considering the representation of the applicant.

5.

In view of the above submission, I direct the competent authority to consider Annexure A6 representation before final selection is made and on the basis of Annexure A5 notification. The competent authority is directed to consider Annexure A6 representation in the light of relevant rules, regulations and decisions and pass a speaking order on or before the next selection list is published on the basis of Annexure A5.

6.

The Original Application is disposed of as above at the admission stage itself. No costs.

Issue copy of the order to learned counsel on both sides.