High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 09 AP CK 4371

B Venkata Subba Reddy vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh & Ors.

Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati · Decided on 21 September 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravi Cheemalapati, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 33404 of 2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 236 words

Aggrieved by the action of respondent authorities in seizing the petitioner’s vehicle bearing registration No.NL01B2331 by issuing Challan dated 15.11.2025 demanding tax and fine, the present Writ Petition has been filed.

2.

Heard Sri Mulla Sohail Shareef, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Transport Department.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Transport Department collectively submitted that the issue involved in this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court dated 16.09.2025 in Writ Petition No.24887 of 2025 and prayed to pass similar order in this Writ Petition also.

4.

Taking into consideration the submission made by the learned counsel for the parties, this Court is inclined to dispose of the Writ Petition in terms of the order dated 16.09.2025 passed in Writ Petition No.24887 of 2025, by passing the following order:

“The petitioner is directed to comply with G.O.Ms.No.285, TR & B (Tr-II) dated 15.09.1984 and also to pay the compounding fee as stated in the Challan, dated 15.11.2025. Further, upon compliance with the directions of this Court, the District Transport Commissioner and Secretary shall be obligated to release the vehicle bearing No.NL01B2331 forthwith.”

5.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any in the writ petition, shall also stand closed.