High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 08 TEL CK 5512

Gugulothu Upendra vs The State Of Telangana & Ors.

Telangana High Court · Decided on 19 August 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Surepalli Nanda, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No.26757 of 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 642 words

Heard Sri Koppula Gopal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies, appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1, to 5 and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing on behalf of the respondent No.6.

2.

The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under:

“...to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents Nos. 2 to 6 in seizing the Vehicle Goods Carriage MMV(EICHER DCM) bearing Number AP 29V-9897 of the petitioner under cover of panchanama dated 29-6-2026 in Crime No. 115 of 2026 dated 18-6-2026 is illegal, improper without any power or authority under law and violation of Articles 19(1)(g) of the constitution of India and consequently set aside the same and pass.”

3.

The case of the petitioner in brief as per the averments made in the affidavit filed by the petitioner in support of the present writ petition is as under:

The petitioner is the owner of Vehicle bearing Registration No. AP 29 V 9897. The petitioner has been using the subject vehicle for transportation of goods on hire. On 18.06.2026, while the vehicle was transporting a consignment of rice, respondent No.6, along with police officials, intercepted and inspected the vehicle. Alleging that the rice appeared to be Public Distribution System (PDS) rice, the authorities seized both the rice and the vehicle.

Thereafter, by registering F.I.R. No.115 of 2026 dated 18.06.2026, the vehicle was taken into custody and kept under the custody of respondent No.6. The continued detention of the vehicle has deprived the petitioner's livelihood. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner had approached this Court by filing the present Writ Petition.

PERUSED THE RECORD:

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION:

4.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is only seeking release of Vehicle bearing Registration No. AP 29 V 9897, which had been seized in connection with F.I.R. No.115 of 2026 dated 18.06.2026, under Section 318 (4) of BNS, 2023 and Section 7 of Essential Commodities Act, 1955. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner further contends that under similar circumstances, this Court passed order in favour of petitioner thereunder in W.P. No.2405 of 2026 vide its order dated 28.01.2026 and therefore, the petitioner herein is entitled for similar relief as extended to the petitioner in W.P. No.2405 of 2026, dated 28.01.2026.

5.

The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies, appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 to 5 and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing on behalf of the respondent No.6 do not dispute the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

6.

Taking into consideration the submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that under similar circumstances, this Court disposed of W.P. No.2405 of 2026, dated 28.01.2026 and had passed orders in favour of the petitioner thereunder, and duly considering the said order, the present writ petition is also disposed of in terms of the order of this Court, dated 28.01.2026 passed in W.P. No.2405 of 2026, directing the respondents to release the Vehicle bearing Registration No. AP 29 V 9897 to the petitioner upon the petitioner furnishing bank guarantee by way of fixed deposit for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) in favour of the respondent No.2 and also upon the petitioner furnishing an undertaking that the petitioner will not alienate the subject vehicle or alter its nature or create any encumbrance on it. The release of the subject vehicle shall be subject to the outcome of the confiscation proceedings under Section 6-A of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.