High CourtsSingle Bench(1981) 08 J&K CK 0003

Yasmina vs Nazir Ahmad

Jammu And Kashmir High Court · Decided on 13 August 1981 · Citation: (1982) SriLJ 59

HON’BLE JUDGES
I.K.Kotwal, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Reference No. 35 of 1981

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 406 words
1.

This is a reference made by Sessions Judge. Badgam recommending enhancement of monthly maintenance allowance of Rs. 50/ ordered jointly

in favour of two minor children of the respondent, namely, Yasmina and Firdous Ahmad, by Chief Judl. Magistrate Badgam, The reference has

been made on two grounds; one, that the learned Magistrate could not have made joint award, and two, that the amount awarded by him was

much too inadequate keeping in view the bare necessities of life for the children.

2.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and gone through the order of reference as well as the order passed by the learned Magistrate

and the evidence recorded by him.

3.

There can be no manner of doubt that a joint award of maintenance under section 488 Cr. P. C. is not countenanced by law. An award, in case

it is to be made in favour of more than one person, must indicate distinstly as to what has been awarded and in favour of whom. I also agree with

the learned Sessions Judge that the consolidated amount of Rs. 50/ awarded by the learned Magistrate is much too inadequate. I do not agree with

him that the respodent should pay Rs 75/ per month to Mst. Yasmina and Rs. 100/ per month to Firdous Ahmad. Both the children are minors and

there is nothing on the record to indicate as to how much be required to meet their bare requirements. The court has therefore to make assessment

on some guesswork Respondent is only alleged to be a contractor. There is nothing on the record to indicate as to how much he is earning per

month. Keeping in view the rising prices of these days and the modest income that the respondent may be earning per month, in my opinion Rs. 50/

per month to each of the petitioner namely Yasmina and Firdous Ahmad would meet the requirement's of justice.

Accepting the reference, I modify the order passed by the learned C. J. M. Badgam and direct that the respondent shall pay Rs. 50/ each per

month to his son and daughter Firdous Ahmad and yasmina by way of maintenance. This order shall not become operative from the date of

application as recommended by the learned Sessions Judge but shall become operative from the date of the final order passed by the learned C J

M. The reference is disposed of accordingly.