High CourtsSingle Bench(2000) 09 GUJ CK 0003

Yashodhara Pandya vs State of Gujarat

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 8 September 2000 · Citation: (2001) 70 GLH 21 : (2001) 21 GLH 70

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.R. Tripathi, J
CASE NUMBER
Special Civil Application No. 8420 of 1991

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 246 words

R.R. Tripathi, J.—The present petition is filed by the petitioner for the reliefs as prayed for in para 8 of the petitioner, namely, declaring the action of the respondents in refusing to register the change of name and surname of the petitioner as arbitrary, capricious, violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, illegal, null and void and for quashing and setting aside the same. In para 8(B) the petitioner has prayed that;

8.

.. .. be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari, mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order -

(A) xx xx

(B) directing the respondents to register the change in the name of the petitioner as Yashodhara Manushi or Yashodhara Hasumati Manubhai Manushi and to publish the same in the Gazette forthwith."

2.

Ms.Nandini Joshi, learned Assistant Government Pleader pointed out that one of the conditions enjoined for getting the name published in the Gazette is that the applicant cannot make any changes in father''s name. In the present case, one of the prayers of the petitioner is not objected by the respondents and it is agreed that her name will be published in the Gazette as "Yashodhara Manushi".

3.

That being so, the present petition is allowed to that extent only. The name of the petitioner be published in the gazette as per the prayer, i.e. "Yashodhara Manushi", as against "Yashodhara Pandya". The petition is allowed with no order as to costs. Rule is made absolute.