High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 05 P&H CK 0017

Virinder Singh and Others vs State of Punjab and Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 30 May 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
Surya Kant, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civl Writ Petition No. 9679 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 184 words

Surya Kant, J.—Notice of motion.

2.

Mr. Rajesh Bhardwaj, Additional Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the Respondents.

3.

In view of the nature of order which I propose to pass, there is no need to seek any counter reply from the Respondents at this stage.

4.

The Petitioners are serving/retired Lecturers/Headmasters/ Teachers/Masters/Mistresses/DPE of the Education Department, Government of Punjab. They seek a mandamus to direct the Respondents to permit them to re-exercise their option within some reasonable period for the grant of revised pay-scales w.e.f. 1.1.1986 in terms of the notification/Circular dated 24.12.1992 (Annexure P2).

5.

During the course of hearing, learned Counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the controversy involved in this case stands settled by a decision dated 25.2.2010 rendered by this Court in Civil Writ Petition No. 7464 of 2009 (Surinder Kumar and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors.) (Annexure P-5) vide which the similarly situated Petitioners have been given the desired relief.

6.

The writ petition is accordingly allowed in terms of the afore-stated decision of this Court in Surinder Kumar and others'' case (supra).