Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2026) 10 CAT CK 4952

Upendra Kumar & Ors. vs The Union Of India & Ors.

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 28 October 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Narendra Kumar Johari, Member (J) · Kumar Rajesh Chandra, Member (A)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
O.A. No. 050/00640/2026, M.A. No. 050/00528/2026, M.A. No. 050/00527/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 411 words

PER:-MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JOHARI, MEMBER[J]

Shri Deepak Kumar Sinha along with Ms. Mahi Singh, learned counsel for the applicant is present.

Shri Rana Randhir Singh, ld. Addl. Standing Counsel on receipt of advance copy of O.A. has appeared for the opposite parties.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the applicants.

Bench 3. MA No. 527 of 2026, filed by the applicants to pursue the matter jointly in one application since the grievance and cause of action are common and same, is allowed.

. At the very outset, learned counsel for applicants has submitted that so far as grievance of the applicants is concerned they have given a representation to Opposite Party No. 4 on different dates from July to August, 2026 vide Annexure-A/7 Series (page 50 to 70 of the OA) which are still pending before the authority concerned.

It is further submitted by the counsel for the applicants that the grievance of the applicants is covered with the judgment of Hon’ble High Court, Patna dated 13.02.2025 in CWJC No. 7375 of 2024 and applicants are hopeful that if their representations are considered and decided by the authority concerned in accordance with the law/rules, their grievance at this stage shall be redressed. He further submitted that the purpose of this OA will be served if the Opposite Party No. 4/competent authority is directed to consider and decide the representation of the applicants by a reasoned and speaking order in a time bound manner.

4.

Learned counsel for the opposite parties raised no objection to the submission of counsel for applicant.

5.

However, by considering the innocuous prayer of the applicants for disposal of their representation in accordance with law and rules, the present OA is disposed of, without entering into the provisions of Limitation as well as merit of the case, with direction to the Opposite Party No. 4/competent authority to consider and decide the representation of the applicants placed at Annexure-A/7 (page 50 to 70 of the OA) by passing a reasoned and speaking order within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. The applicants along with certified copy of this order shall also submit the copies of their representations, which were given by them earlier Bench and judgment of the Hon’ble High Court which is being relied by them.

6.

In view of the above, all the MAs stand disposed of.

7.

There shall be no order as to costs.