High CourtsSingle Bench(2004) 09 JH CK 0053

Upendra Chouhan and Another vs Central Coalfields Ltd. and Others

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 1 September 2004 · Citation: (2004) 4 JCR 484

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Acting C.J.
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (S) No. 4210 of 2004

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 243 words

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, A.C.J.

1.

This application has been preferred by petitioners against the order dated 11th October, 2000 issued by the Personal Manager. Dakra Colliery of M/s. Central Coallields Limited, whereby and whereunder, the application for compassionate appointment of the petitioners has been rejected. They have so challenged the order dated 11.6.2003 issued by the Personal Manager (Manpower) of M/s. Central Coalfields Ltd., whereby and whereunder, the application preferred by petitioner No, 2 for compassionate appointment has also been rejected.

2.

According to petitioners, one (late Rikhia Chouhan) was an employee of M/s. Central Coalfields Ltd. in its N.K. Area, Dakra. She died in harness on 2.5.1998. The petitioner No, 1 is the son-in-law and petitioner No, 2 is the daughter of said (late Rikhia Chouhan). The petitioner No. 1 initially applied for his appointment being the son-in-law of the deceased after about one year from the date of death of Rikhia Chouhar. It was rejected on llth October 2000. Thereafter, the application preferred on behalf of petitioner No. 2 for her compassionate appointment was also rejected on 10.2.2003.

3.

There is nothing on record to suggest that the petitioner No. 1 was dependant of late Rikhia Chouhan i.e., he was gharjamai of late Rikhai Chouhan. So far as petitioner No. 2 is concerned, admittedly she had not applied for compassionate appointment in time.

4.

In the facts and circumstances, no relief can be granted to the petitioners. This writ petition is dismissed.