High CourtsSingle Bench(2012) 09 JH CK 0041

Umesh Kumar vs The State of Jharkhand and Others

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 5 September 2012

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Singh, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (S) No. 4311 of 2003

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 247 words

Alok Singh

1.

Petitioner is admittedly senior to the Respondent No. 5, Mr. Satya Deo Ram. Respondent No. 5 was given charge of the officiating Principal in the Government Polytechnic, Ranchi vide impugned order dated 30.04.2003, thereby, forcing the petitioner to work under his junior. Petitioner, feeling aggrieved, has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court, by way of the present writ petition.

2.

During the pendency of this writ petition, petitioner was transferred to Government Polytechnic, Kharsawan as In-Charge, Principal vide order dated 31.12.2008. In the light of the order dated 31.12.2008, State Government took the stand that since the petitioner has already been transferred to the Government Polytechnic, Kharsawan as In-Charge, Principal, therefore, the present writ petition rendered infructuous.

3.

However, fact remains that once again, during the pendency of the present writ petition, petitioner was transferred back to the Government Polytechnic, Ranchi as a Lecturer vide order dated 31.12.2010. Again, petitioner is working under the Respondent No. 5, who is junior to him.

4.

Copy of the letter No. 7/V.V.R.-06/2004 Ka.442 dated 25th January, 2006 is handed over to this Court, which is kept on record. Perusal of the letter dated 25th January, 2006 reveals that the Government has decided to give the charge of the Principal to the senior most lecturer, therefore, order impugned is against the government policy itself, therefore, impugned order cannot be sustained in the eyes of law. Impugned order dated 30.04.2003 stands quashed. Present writ petition stands allowed accordingly.