High CourtsDivision Bench(2020) 12 PAT CK 0284

Umarendra Kumar Suman @ Umarendra Kumar vs State Of Bihar And Ors

Patna High Court · Decided on 7 December 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay Karol, CJ · S. Kumar, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7847 Of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 300 words

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief:-

(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction commanding the respondents to renovate the pond in question situated at Mauza-Dhawdadh

within the district of Rohtas and to ensure removal of silt from the bed of the pond and to do the needful to maintain the water level of the pond.

(ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction commanding the respondents to ensure maintenance of the pond and channels in question in

future.â€​

This writ petition in form of PIL has been filed by the petitioner in representative capacity stating therein that in Mauza-Dhawdadh the only source of

ground level water and irrigation of the field is the pond and channel over the aforesaid plots. Pond is from time immemorial and channels were

constructed by the irrigation department in the year 1960-65. The gates over the channels to control the water flow do not work and the pond is filled

with heavy silt and its banks are also to be repaired to hold more water. Petitioner gave several representation to respondent authorities for renovation

of the pond but no action has been taken by them although need to renovate the pond has been admitted by them for which a DPR was also prepared

and fund was also made available but still work was never executed.

Writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before the respondent no. 3 District Magistrate, Rohtas at

Sasaram, who shall consider the grievances of the petitioner as detailed in representation and pass necessary order within 8 weeks from the date of its

filing.

Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach the Court afresh for the same and subsequent cause of action, if so required and desired.