High CourtsSingle Bench(2012) 02 P&H CK 0206

Udey Partap Singh vs The Union Territory, Chandigarh and another

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 1 February 2012

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ranjit Singh, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous M No. 19034 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 197 words

Ranjit Singh, J.—At one stage, the matter was amicably resolved between the parties. This fact was also noticed by this Court while dealing with the case of custody of the children in this regard. The arrest of the petitioner was stayed. He has joined the investigation. As per the State counsel, some of the dowry articles were to be returned, which have yet not returned. Counsel for the complainant says that the compromise was forcibly obtained and was not a voluntary act. He has moved an application in this regard. Actually, it is a case of return of certain articles. Apparently, no case for custodial interrogation is made out.

2.

Order dated 5.7.2011 is made absolute. The petitioner would be at liberty to approach the trial Court for regular bail once the challan is presented. The trial Court would consider the grant of regular bail in the light of order passed by this Court.

3.

The petitioner may be asked to return all the dowry articles, which are yet to be recovered. In case the petitioner refuses to do so, the State would be at liberty to move an application.

4.

The petition is accordingly disposed of.