High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 09 AP CK 2041

Turubilli Uday Kumar Alias Uday vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati · Decided on 10 September 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Y. Lakshmana Rao, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Petition No: 7794/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 529 words

The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’), seeking to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.6 on bail in Crime No.74 of 2026 of Kothavalasa Police Station, Vizianagaram District, registered for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(B) read with 8(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for brevity ‘the NDPS Act’).

2.

Mr.Kakumanu Joji Amrutha Raju, the learned counsel for the Petitioner, submits that the Petitioner is innocent of the alleged offence and he has been falsely implicated by the police. It is further submitted that the Petitioner is the sole earning member of the family and, therefore, his incarceration would cause undue hardship to his dependents. He is a law-abiding citizen. The Petitioner undertakes to strictly adhere to any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, it is urged to allow the Criminal Petition.

3.

Per contra, Mr.Neelotpal Ganji, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the grant of bail to the Petitioner and submitted that, though the Charge Sheet has already been filed, the accusations against the Petitioner are well founded. Hence, urged to dismiss the Criminal Petition.

4.

Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record.

5.

On perusal of the record, the Petitioner is arraigned as Accused No.6 in this case. The Petitioner was arrested on 06.07.2026 and has been in judicial custody for the past 66 days. There are a total of eight accused in this case. The seized contraband amounts to 12 kilograms in total, out of which 1.5 kilograms of ganja was seized from the possession of Petitioner/Accused No.6. There are no similar adverse antecedents reported against the Petitioner. After thorough investigation, a Charge Sheet was filed on 03.09.2026.

6.

The Petitioner is a permanent resident of Kothavalasa Village, Vizianagaram District. He has got fixed abode. If the Petitioner is enlarged on bail, he is likely to cooperate with the learned Trial Court for the expeditious disposal of the case.

7.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and gravity of allegations levelled against the Petitioner/Accused No.6, this Court is inclined to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.6 on bail with some stringent conditions.

8.

In the result, the Criminal Petition is allowed with the following stringent conditions:

i.

The Petitioner/Accused No.6 shall be enlarged on bail subject to his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kothavalasa.

ii.

The Petitioner/Accused No.6 shall appear before the learned Trial Court on each and every adjournment without fail.

iii.

The Petitioner/Accused No.6 shall not leave the limits of the State of Andhra Pradesh without prior permission from the learned Trial Court concerned.

iv.

The Petitioner/Accused No.6 shall not indulge in any similar offence during the bail period.

v.

The Petitioner/Accused No.6 shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court.