AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Heard counsel for the State and counsel for
Respondent No. 2. He also submits that the he represents
the interest of other private-respondents also.
I. A. No. 8194 of 2015 is for condonation of
delay of three years and 209 days. One of the reasons given
for delay is that a review was filed against the order of the
Learned Single Judge and the same came to be finally
dismissed. Thereafter, opinion was obtained and an appeal
was filed.
The review was dismissed on 01.09.2014. The
appeal has been filed on 01.10.2015. After a delay of almost
one year. The Court is not convinced that it takes a year for
obtaining opinion as well as preparing a memo of appeal.
Therefore the limitation petition does not deserve any
consideration.
Limitation petition is dismissed.
The Court even otherwise went through the
impugned order, dated 13.01.2012. The Learned Single
Judge has passed the order, giving leeway to the Civil
Surgeon to take a decision with regard to payment of the
regular salary in light of regularization of their services.
Counsel for the State informs the Court that the
matter was considered and rejected.
The ball was very much in the court of the State
to take decision.
The appeal, therefore, also does not deserve any
indulgence. Both the limitation petition as well as the appeal
is dismissed.