AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Biren Vaishnav, J
Mr. Arpit Patel, learned advocate appears for respondent no. 1. He is permitted to file his vakalatnama before the Registry.
Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties.
Considering the averments made in the petition and having heard learned advocates for the parties, this court would not enter into an inquiry of an inquisitorial nature in context of the prayers made in the petition. It will be in the fitness of things if the petitioner is left with the liberty to approach the competent authority in order to settle his grievances with regard to the grievances raised in this petition.
With the above observations, petition is accordingly disposed of. Needless to say that if the petitioner approaches the competent authority within two weeks from today, appropriate decision in accordance with
Downloaded on : Wed Dec 08 09:53:22 IST 2021 law will be taken by the authorities concerned preferably within eight weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. Notice is discharged. Interim relief if any shall stand vacated.
Direct service is permitted.
