High CourtsSingle Bench(2017) 04 DEL CK 0019

Tata Sons Limited vs John Doe(s)

Delhi High Court · Decided on 27 April 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.
RESULT
Disposed Off
CASE NUMBER
CS(COMM) 1601 of 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 166 words

Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.—The summons issued to the newly impleaded defendants No.6 to 8 are awaited and the defendant No.9 is reported to be unserved.

2.

The plaintiff however has filed an affidavit of service of defendants No.6 to 8 and qua defendant No.9, the counsel for the plaintiffs states that three persons named Ashok Kumar Agarwal were found at the address given. He however states that the service provider has furnished the cell phone number of Ashok Kumar Agarwal who was identified.

3.

The plaintiffs are permitted to serve the defendant No.9 Ashok Kumar Agarwal by text message as well as through Whatsapp as well as by email and to file affidavit of service.

4.

The counsel appearing for defendants No.6 to 8 seeks time to file written statement.

5.

Written statement be filed within four weeks.

6.

Replication thereto, if any be filed within further four weeks thereafter.

7.

List for framing of issues, if any and for further consideration on 2nd August, 2017.