High CourtsSingle Bench(2023) 01 DEL CK 0954

Syed Fahmi Ali vs Sportina Payce Infrastruture Pvt. Ltd

Delhi High Court · Decided on 11 January 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Tushar Rao Gedela, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
EX.F.A. 4/2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 199 words

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J. (ORAL)

[ The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid mode ]

CM APPL. 1251/2023-EXEMP.

1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

Application stands disposed of.

CM APPL. 1253/2023 (DELAY 11 DAYS IN FILING APPEAL)

3.

This is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal.

4.

For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. The delay of 11 days in filing the present appeal is condoned.

5.

The application is disposed of.

EX.F.A. 4/2023 & CM APPL. 1252/2023 (STAY)

6.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that subsequent to the passing of the impugned order, this court in another petition has released an amount of Rs. 2 Crore in favour of the respondent.

7.

In view of the above, learned counsel seeks liberty to approach the Executing Court with an appropriate application in respect of the submission that the respondent has already received an amount of Rs.2 Crore from this court in a different proceedings.

8.

In view of the above submissions, the liberty sought is granted without prejudice to the rights & contentions of the appellant.

9.

The appeal is disposed of in accordance with the aforesaid directions.