High CourtsDivision Bench(2024) 05 DEL CK 3583

Dhruv Varma vs M/s Ratna Commercial Enterprises Ltd. & Ors.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 31 May 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajiv Shakdher, J · Amit Bansal, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
EFA(OS) 12/2024 & CM Nos.34252-53/2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 232 words

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL):

CM No.34252/2024

1.

Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

EFA(OS) 12/2024 & CM No.34253/2024 [Application filed on behalf of the appellant seeking condonation of delay of 722 days in filing the appeal]

2.

This is an appeal, whereby challenge is laid to the order dated 17.12.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge in Ex.APPL.(OS)No.380/2011 preferred in Ex.P.No.160/2011.

3.

The principal grievance of the appellant is that his passport, which is lying in the custody of this court, has not been released.

4.

Admittedly, the decretal amount, i.e., Rs.41,64,47,667/-, even according to the appellant, is outstanding.

5.

A perusal of the order dated 14.01.2013 would show that the appellant had himself offered to deposit his passport.

6.

As would be evident, this appeal, even according to the appellant, has been filed after a delay of 722 days.

6.1

Furthermore, the appellant has not placed on record anything which would demonstrate that he has plans to travel abroad.

7.

Therefore, at this juncture, we are not inclined to interfere with the order dated 17.12.2021.

8.

As and when the appellant’s interests necessitate the requirement to travel abroad, an application may be filed which will then be considered, albeit as per law.

9.

The appeal is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Consequently, the pending application shall stand closed.

10.

Parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.