Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2022) 06 CAT CK 0853

Sunil Kumar vs Union Of India & Ors.

Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad · Decided on 2 June 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Tarun Shridhar, Member (Administrative) · Pratima K Gupta, Member (Judicial)
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 330/00396/2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 317 words

Hon’ble Mr. Tarun Shridhar, Member (Administrative) : Shri Avinash Kumar Sharma and Shri Sunil, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri P.K. Rai, learned counsel for the respondents are present.

2.

The present OA has been filed seeking the following reliefs :-

“(i)

To issue order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to consider the application of the applicant and select in the selection list of Chief Loco Inspector and send to training for pre selection coaching.

(ii)

To issue order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondent No.3 to decide the representation dated 31.05.2021 (Annexure No.1).

(iii)

Award the costs of the original application favour of the applicant.”

3.

During the course of hearing on the earlier occasion, the learned counsel for the respondents was directed to inform the outcome of the result of the examination to us in sealed cover. Learned counsel has since complied with these directions and provided the necessary information.

4.

We have gone through the said information which discloses that none of the applicants has been successful in the selection examination wherein 60% was the established Benchmark for qualification. Only one candidate named Shri Pritam Saurabh son of Shri Ayodhya has been successful in the said examination. The information has been furnished to us under the signature of a responsible officer of the department i.e. Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, Ijjatnagar and we have absolutely no grounds to doubt the veracity of the same.

5.

In view of the developments and the information furnished before us, nothing sustains in the present original application and accordingly, the OA is dismissed. No order as to costs.

6.

The letter of Senior Divisional Personnel Officer vide which the result was submitted to us is returned to the learned counsel for the respondents.

7.

All the MAs associated with this original application stand disposed of as having become infructuous.