High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 12 SHI CK 0029

Sunil Kumar vs State Of H.P. & Anr

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 30 December 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
CWP No. 16464 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 228 words

Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J

1.

Notice. Mr. Dalip K Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

2.

This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive relief:-

“That writ of mandamus may kindly be issued, directing the respondents to grant benefit of earned leave to the petitioner from the due date, in view of the judgment dated 08.08.2023 rendered by this Hon’ble Court in CWP No.5043/2022, titled as Sunita Sagroli Vs.State of H.P. (Annexure P-1) and judgment dated 01.12.2022 passed by this Hon’ble Court in CWP No.7359/2021, titled as Amita Gupta Vs/ State of H.P. & Ors. (Annexure P-2).

3.

Admittedly, the petitioner has invoked extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without even preferring any representation to the competent authority for the redresssal of his grievances raised in the writ petition.

4.

Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today. In case, such representation is so preferred, the competent authority shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, within further period of four weeks. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner.

5.

The instant petition is disposed of in above terms. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.