High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 02 PAT CK 0061

Sudhanshu Kumar son of Sri Sanjay Singh vs The Bihar School Examination Board

Patna High Court · Decided on 13 February 2017 · Citation: (2017) 2 PLJR 135

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dr. Ravi Ranjan
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1943 Of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 341 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2.

Petitioner's grievance is that in the check-list of the Intermediate Examination (Session 2015-17), as contained in Annexure-4, at the serial no. 806, in the place of the petitioner's name, the name of one Shreya Singh appears, father's name has wrongly been entered though the name of mother is correct and the photograph of the petitioner is correctly pasted there.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner drew attention of this Court towards Annexure-7 to show that the aforesaid Shreya Singh has given a separate registration number. It is contended that though the School has also written to the Secretary Bihar School Examination Board vide Annexure-5 on 09.01.2017 itself but correction of the name has not been done and due to that the petitioner has not been given admit card in his name so that he could appear in the 12th Board Examination which is to commence from tomorrow.

4.

A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the

Board. It is stated that a chance was given to the School to rectify the mistake online or by sending objection through e-mail but that was not done and at the fag end this writ petition has been filed.

5.

In my view, the petitioner even though the School did not take action within the time, he being a student cannot be faulted with. Apparently, his name is missing from Annexure-4 though his picture is there. In such a situation, this Court would direct the respondent Board to allow the petitioner to appear in the concerned examination. Since it is submitted that at the fag end several unwarranted persons may come and under the garb of such situation taking advantage thereof may avail opportunity of writing the examination which they are not supposed to do, the Board would be at liberty to hold an inquiry regarding the credentials of the petitioner and his result would only be declared if nothing is found against him.

6.

Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of.