High CourtsDivision Bench(1915) 04 MAD CK 0010

Sudalayadum Perumal Nadan and Others vs Sivananji Nadachi

Madras High Court · Decided on 15 April 1915 · Citation: 30 Ind. Cas. 544 : (1915) 2 LW 729

HON’BLE JUDGES
Seshagiri Aiyar, J · Oldfield, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 149 words
1.

The learned Subordinate Judge dismissed the appellants'' petition to set aside the decree of the Small Cause suit, because appellants having

been called on to deposit money and the time granted for doing so having been extended until 3rd December 1912, no deposit was made before

the petition was taken up for orders on that date. Dakins v. Wagner 3 Dow. and R. (1791) 4 Bro. C.C. 358; Isaacs v. Royal Insurance Co.

(1870) 39 L.J. Ex. 189. are authorities for holding that, when time is given for the performance of any act till a certain date, it includes that date.

The learned Subordinate Judge, therefore, had no jurisdiction to pass his order of dismissal before 4th December 1912. We must allow the Letters

Patent Appeal and set aside the Subordinate Judge''s order dismissing the petition before him; costs to abide the result of the Small Cause suit.