High CourtsDivision Bench(1915) 04 MAD CK 0029

S. Perumal Nadan and Others vs Sivanamji Nadachi

Madras High Court · Decided on 15 April 1915 · Citation: AIR 1916 Mad 840(1) : (1916) ILR (Mad) 583

HON’BLE JUDGES
Seshagiri Ayyar, J · Oldfield, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 153 words

Oldfield, J.—The learned Subordinate Judge dismissed the appellant''s petition to set aside the decree of the Small Cause Suit, because

appellants having been called on to deposit money and the time granted for doing so having bean extended until 3rd December 1912, no deposit

was made before the petition was taken up for orders on that date. Dawkins v. Wagner (1832) 3 Dowl. 535, Knox v. Simmonds (1791) 3 Bro.

C.C. 358 and Isaacs v. Royal Insurance Co. (1870) L.R. 5 Ex. 296 are authorities for holding that when time is given for the performance of any

act till a certain date, it includes that date. The learned Subordinate Judge therefore had no jurisdiction to pass his order of dismissal before 4th

December 1912. We must allow the Letters Patent Appeal and set aside the Subordinate Judge''s order dismissing the petition before him; costs

to abide the result of the Small Cause Suit.